Chapter 12. Who to Believe: Epistemic Authority
§4 Strong Objectivity
(Sandra Harding)
In traditional critical thinking, we are often told that “objectivity” means being a neutral observer—stripping away our personal history, gender, race, and social class to see the “pure” truth. However, philosopher Sandra Harding argues that this “view from nowhere” is actually a myth. Instead, she proposes Strong Objectivity (a key component of Standpoint Theory).
4.1 The Weakness of “Weak” Objectivity
Harding argues that the traditional scientific and academic approach is actually “Weak Objectivity.”
-
The Problem: When a group of researchers all come from the same social background (e.g., wealthy, white, male), they share the same “blind spots.” They don’t see their own biases because everyone in the room shares them.
-
The Result: They mistake their specific cultural perspective for “universal truth.” This leads to distorted knowledge in medicine, history, and sociology.
4.2 What is “Strong Objectivity”?
Strong Objectivity is the practice of starting research from the lives of the marginalized. 1. Situating the Knower: We must admit that all knowledge is “situated”—it comes from a specific person in a specific place at a specific time.
2. Starting from the Outside: By looking at a social system or a scientific problem from the perspective of those who are usually excluded (the “outsiders”), we can see things that are invisible to those at the center of power.
3. The Goal: The purpose isn’t to be “biased” toward marginalized groups, but to use their unique Standpoints to filter out the hidden biases of the dominant group. This makes the final conclusion more objective, not less.
4.3 Strong Objectivity in Practice
To be a Reasonable Person using Strong Objectivity, you don’t just ask “What are the facts?” You also ask “Whose perspective is missing from these facts?”
-
In Medicine: For years, heart attack symptoms were studied primarily in men. Strong Objectivity would require starting research with women’s experiences, leading to the discovery that women often experience different symptoms (like jaw pain or nausea).
-
In History: Rather than only reading the journals of generals and kings, a “Strongly Objective” historian would also look at the accounts of soldiers, laborers, and enslaved people to get a more accurate map of what actually happened.
§4 Summary Table: Traditional vs. Strong Objectivity
| Feature | Traditional (“Weak”) Objectivity | Strong Objectivity |
| Goal | To be “neutral” and “detached.” | To be “rigorous” and “inclusive.” |
| Method | Ignore the identity of the researcher. | Acknowledge the “standpoint” of the researcher. |
| Bias | Assumes bias can be easily deleted. | Assumes bias is hidden and requires diverse perspectives to find. |
| Result | Often reflects the views of the powerful. | Provides a more complete and accurate “map” of reality. |