David Carter
One major side effect of longer prison sentences is an aging incarcerated population. In the past 20 years, the nation’s correctional systems has seen a dramatic increase in the proportion of prisoners over age 55. As McKillop and Boucher (2018) relate in the graphic below (based on BJS data), there has been a 280% increase in such prisoners [1]
As the title above implies, there is a growing cost associated with this subpopulation of inmates; in fact, the care of inmates over 55 is estimated to be three times as expensive as that of inmates under 55. [2] Beyond the matter of cost, this phenomenon raises moral question concerning the treatment of prisoners as they enter the last phase of their lives. Many organizations have advocated for the compassionate release of inmates entering hospice care or in need of assisted living conditions. Other have argued that it is unfair to continue to punish individuals who are at low-risk of re-offending.
Overcrowding
It is widely agreed that the imposition of longer sentences has led to profound overcrowding in many prison systems across the country – and an unmanageable burden of individuals under community supervision. It is estimated that we have nearly 6 million individuals under correctional control in the United States, and while that number has subsided in recent years, the rate of decrease is slow. The below graphic depicts level of correctional control by state, showing, moreover, how different states “distribute” the offenders they manage. [3]
Rates of Correctional Control
Prison overcrowding is problematic for multiple reasons. First, when there are too many individuals housed within a facility, there are more assaults and injuries that occur within the institution. Moreover, there is a safety concern for not only inmates, but also staff. Second, the more people you have in a facility, the faster that facility wears down. Operating a jail or prison at maximum (or over maximum) capacity causes more items to break or wear out within the facility at a fast rate. Finally, when individuals are unable to access adequate health care because of the excessively long waits, due to overcrowding, it is a violation of their constitutional rights, as found in the case of Estelle v. Gamble (1976), and more recently, Brown v. Plata (2011) [4] Unfortunately, many correctional systems (including California’s, which was ordered to dramatically lower its burden of inmates over 10 years ago) have responded to overcrowding by simply moving prisoners around – to county jails, other state systems, or private facilities.
- McKillop, M., & Boucher, A. (2018). Aging prison populations drive up costs. Older individuals have more chronic illnesses and other ailments that necessitate greater spending. Available at: https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/articles/2018/02/20/aging-prison-populations-drive-up-costs ↵
- McKillop, M., & Boucher, A. (2018). Aging prison populations drive up costs. Older individuals have more chronic illnesses and other ailments that necessitate greater spending. Available at: https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/articles/2018/02/20/aging-prison-populations-drive-up-costs ↵
- Jones, A. (2018). Correctional control 2018: Incarceration and supervision by state Prison Policy Initiative. Available at: https://www.prisonpolicy.org/reports/correctionalcontrol2018.html#statedata . ↵
- Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 (1976). ↵