OER and Accessibility (And Why It Matters!)
This coffee break activity focuses on these learning objectives.
Learning Objectives
This chapter will support learners in being able to:
- Explain universal design and how it improves accessibility for all learners
- Identify major ways accessibility must be considered when adopting OER
- Reflect on accessibility of current teaching resources and how they can be improved
Open Education, Accessibility, and Universal Design
Let’s begin this OER Coffee Break by watching this short video (3 1/2 mins) from the University of British Columbia’s Centre for Teaching, Learning and Technology. This video focuses on how accessibility and universal design connect with the principles of open education.
One inspiring takeaway from this video gets at the WHY of accessibility and OER:
Often people start with the technical specs [e.g., Title II WCAG 2.1 guidelines] … but I think if you start there, it’s pretty intimidating, and people don’t understand why they’re doing all these … things that could be seen as being picky. I think that instead it’s better to start from a place of empathy for the different kinds of people in the classroom and to understand what their access needs are. If you’re curious about why and you care about those people, then those kind of the technical questions and what do I need to do to make this accessible, you’re more curious, and you’re more interested in the answers.
~ Tara Robertson, Accessibility Librarian, CAPER-BC (Centre for Accessible Post-secondary Education Resources, British Columbia, Canada)
Most open licenses of Open Educational Resources (OER) also make it possible to improve, fix, and/or add to texts and resources that aren’t fully accessible. This is a huge benefit to using OER materials. For a refresher on the different kinds of open licenses and what they allow, please revisit the What is OER? (And How You Can Recognize It!) OER Coffee Break.
What Does Universal Design Mean for Learning and Curriculum Design?
Faculty are required to ensure that the teaching materials they use are accessible to all students. Applying a universal design approach to your curriculum allows you to improve accessibility for all learners.
~ Ronald Mace, Architect and Educator (1942-1998)
Ronald Mace and colleagues at North Carolina State University coined the term Universal Design (UD), with the understanding that designing to meet the needs of disabled people benefits everyone. For example, a curb cutout, designed to accommodate wheelchairs transitioning from sidewalks to streets, also benefits people with strollers, bike riders, and people who may have depth issues.
Universal design means that we design courses that are the most useful to the most different types of people. A proactive approach improves accessibility for all students. For example, although closed captions are added for deaf students, many students may use them when watching online videos in the library or if they are learning English. Using a UD framework makes our courses more user-friendly for all learners.
Equity, Universal Design, and Accessibility
Universal design, accessibility, and OER all support equity. We explored this connection in the Equity in Open Education (Challenges AND Opportunities!) OER Coffee Break, including how these elements are featured in the Framework for Reviewing Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Open Educational Resources, which is a practical starting point for assessing and editing OER for inclusion, diversity, equity and accessibility (IDEA).
An Overview of Accessibility
As instructors, we have legal and ethical obligations to ensure that our courses are fully accessible to all learners, including those with disabilities. We use digital resources in our courses because we believe they enhance learning. However, unless carefully chosen with accessibility in mind, these resources can have the opposite effect for students with disabilities, erecting daunting barriers that make learning difficult. For example, consider the accessibility challenges students described below might face.
- Students who are deaf or hard of hearing are unable to access the contents of a video presentation unless it’s captioned.
- Students who are blind or visually impaired use assistive technologies such as audible screen reader software or Braille devices to access the content of websites, online documents, and other digital resources. They depend on authors providing alternate text that describes the content of images as well as headings, subheadings, lists, and other markup that helps them understand the structure and outline of the resource.
- Some students who have learning disabilities such as dyslexia use assistive technologies that visibly highlight digital text as it’s read aloud, and are therefore dependent on text being readable (as opposed to a scanned image).
- Students who are physically unable to use a mouse are unable to use interactive web and software applications unless these applications can be operated with a keyboard.
- Students who are color blind may be unable to understand content that communicates information solely using color (for example, a bar chart with color as the sole means of differentiating between the bars).
The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1, developed by the World Wide Web Consortium, provide an international standard that defines accessibility of web-based resources. The principles of WCAG 2.1 are applicable to other digital assets as well, including software, video, and digital documents. Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act require colleges, universities, and other postsecondary institutions to provide equal opportunities to people with disabilities in all their operations, and Washington State’s Digital Accessibility Policy also establishes that expectation on the state level.
To learn more about Title II obligations and WCAG 2.1 standards, please enroll in TCC’s Title II Accessibility Compliance Course.
Choosing and Using Accessible Course Material
When choosing among the wide variety of course materials that are available, be sure to consider whether these materials might present challenges or barriers for students with disabilities. Ask specific questions, such as:
- Is all written content presented as text, so students using assistive technologies can read it?
- If the materials include images, is the important information from the images adequately communicated with accompanying alt text?
- If the materials include audio or video content, is it captioned or transcribed?
- If the materials have a clear visual structure including headings, sub-headings, lists, and tables, is this structure properly coded so it’s accessible to blind students using screen readers?
- If the materials include buttons, controls, drag-and-drop, or other interactive features that are operable with a mouse, can they also be operated with a keyboard alone for students who are physically unable to use a mouse?
- Do the materials avoid communicating information using color alone (e.g., the red line means X, the green line means Y)?
If you find open course materials that are perfect for your course but you are unable to answer “Yes” to each of the above questions, then you may need to address the accessibility of the OER materials. In upcoming OER Coffee Breaks, we will explore how to assess these specific areas of accessibility as well as take deeper dives into accessibility issues for OER textbooks and materials in different, common file formats.
Review: Self-Check Activity
References & Attributions
The OER Coffee Break series has original content and adaptations by Jennifer Snoek-Brown, OER Librarian, Tacoma Community College, and is shared under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.
- Content & activity adapted from:
- “Accessibility” from Open Educational Resources: Basics & Beyond by Oklahoma Council for Online Learning Excellence (COLE) Member Volunteers, licensed under CC BY 4.0
- “Open Washington Learn OER – Module 9: Accessibility” by Open Washington, licensed under CC BY 4.0
- “Framework for Reviewing Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, and Accessibility in Open Educational Resources” from Enhancing Inclusion, Diversity, Equity and Accessibility (IDEA) in Open Educational Resources (OER) by University of Southern Queensland, licensed under CC BY NC SA 4.0
- Video source from “Open Dialogues: Open education and accessibility” by Centre for Teaching, Learning and Technology, University of British Columbia is licensed under CC BY 4.0
- Additional content sources from:
- “Equity in Open Education (Challenges AND Opportunities!)” from OER Coffee Breaks by Jennifer Snoek-Brown, TCC Library, licensed under CC BY SA 4.0