"

Chapter 2. “I Already Think For Myself”: Being A Critical Thinker

Summary

This chapter…

  • Identifies the psychological and philosophical obstacles that prevent objective thought.

  • Distinguishes between Categories of Hindrances, specifically psychological factors (how we think) versus philosophical worldviews (what we think).

  • Discusses the impact of self-interest and group-centered thinking on our ability to evaluate evidence fairly.

  • Explores philosophical worldviews such as subjective and social relativism and assesses their logical pitfalls.

  • Introduces technical fundamentals regarding the distinction between objective and subjective statements.

  • Analyzes value judgments, distinguishing between moral and non-moral evaluations.

  • Addresses implicit bias and stereotype threat, providing empirical context for unconscious errors in reasoning.

  • Ends with a review of the “Clifford Standard” and recommendations for further reading on the ethics of belief.


Key Terms

  • Availability Error = relying on evidence because it is memorable or striking rather than because it is trustworthy.

  • Confirmation Bias = the tendency to seek out and use only evidence that confirms our pre-existing views.

  • Dunning-Kruger Effect = the phenomenon of being ignorant of how ignorant we are; overestimating expertise due to a lack of skill in that area.

  • Evidentialism = the view that we must proportion the strength of our belief to the strength of our reasons.

  • Face-Saving = accepting or defending a claim solely to protect one’s image or to avoid admitting a mistake.

  • Homophily = the tendency to give more credence to an argument simply because it comes from someone like us or someone we know.

  • Implicit Bias = unconscious stereotypes or prejudices that influence our judgment without our awareness.

  • Infallibility = the (often erroneous) belief that a person or group is incapable of being wrong.

  • Motivated Reasoning = reasoning for the purpose of supporting a predetermined conclusion rather than uncovering the truth.

  • Objective Statement = a statement whose truth depends on impartial facts independent of what any individual thinks.

  • Philosophical Skepticism = the view that we know much less than we think, often requiring absolute certainty for knowledge.

  • Reasonable Doubt = a standard of evidence where a belief is accepted as knowledge because no robust reasons exist to undermine it.

  • Self-Interested Thinking = accepting a claim solely because it advances or coincides with your personal interests.

  • Social Relativism = the view that truth is relative to societies or cultures.

  • Stereotype Threat = underperforming on tasks due to an awareness of negative stereotypes about one’s group.

  • Subjective Relativism = the view that truth depends solely on what an individual believes.

  • Subjective Statement = a statement whose truth depends entirely on what an individual thinks or feels.

  • Worldview = a philosophy of life; a set of fundamental ideas that act as a filter for how we process information.

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

How to Think For Yourself Copyright © 2023 by Rebeka Ferreira is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.